Quick Info
| Profession | Politician |
|---|---|
| Nationality | Indian |
Do you like Abdullah Azam Khan?
You can vote only once.
67% like · 33% dislike
Bio/Wiki
| Summary | Indian politician associated with the Samajwadi Party and the Rampur district of Uttar Pradesh. He is the son of senior Samajwadi Party leader Azam Khan. He won the Suar seat in the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly in 2017 and again in 2022, though his seat has been vacated twice following court rulings. |
|---|
Relationships & More
| Father | Azam Khan |
|---|---|
| Mother | Tazeen Fatma |
Family
| Father | Azam Khan, Samajwadi Party politician and former Uttar Pradesh cabinet minister |
|---|---|
| Mother | Tazeen Fatma, Samajwadi Party legislator |
Career
| Party | Samajwadi Party |
|---|---|
| Constituency | Suar, Uttar Pradesh |
| Elected | 2017 and 2022 Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly elections |
| Disqualification | Disqualified from the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly in 2019 after the Allahabad High Court set aside his 2017 election over a dispute about his date of birth; the ruling took effect on 16/12/2019 |
| Conviction | Convicted in 2023 in a 2008 wrongful restraint and assault case by a Moradabad court, which led to a further disqualification |
| Second Disqualification | Seat declared vacant from 13/02/2023 after a two-year sentence in a 2008 highway blockade case |
| Later Re-election | Re-elected to the Suar seat in the 2022 assembly polls before the 2023 disqualification |
Some Lesser Known Facts
| 1. His birth date has been disputed in court proceedings, with differing dates appearing on certificates presented in a fake birth certificate case. | |
| 2. His nomination paper for the 2017 election gave a birth date of 30/09/1990, while a challenger argued his educational certificates showed 01/01/1993. | |
| 3. The Allahabad High Court ruled in 2019 that he had not reached the minimum age of 25 when he filed his 2017 nomination. | |
| 4. He and his mother were named in a fake birth certificate case, and a special court issued non-bailable warrants against them when they failed to appear at a hearing. |
Social Media